Cracking Sdg 6.3.1 From Wastewater Monitoring to Energy Recovery
Summary
In many countries, wastewater management, treatment, and monitoring are often underappreciated services, attracting less investor interest compared to water supply. Global monitoring of SDG indicator 6.3.1, which focuses on the proportion of total and industrial safely treated wastewater flows, has revealed an important lack of knowledge on national wastewater statistics. The first part of this session aims to motivate water operators to better collect and report wastewater data for improving the reporting on SDG indicator 6.3.1, but also to present some innovative case studies which are beyond the current global monitoring effort. In Ghana, the combination with the water quality parameters has allowed to estimate the pollutant loads generated, treated and discharged by industrial activities. In Mexico, the physicochemical monitoring of the influent and effluent of a Nature Based Solution (NbS) will allow to evaluate its real effectiveness in improving the quality of wastewater. Finally, in Thailand the distribution of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from domestic wastewater management across different regions and various treatment processes, has been for the first time assessed following IPCC methodology.
Pipelines, manholes, and sewer pits are vital components of wastewater systems, yet managing them is often hindered by chaotic environments, limited budgets, and knowledge gaps. The second part of the session presents a practical roadmap for strengthening asset management in the field, offering key steps to improve planning, prioritization, and maintenance. We will showcase examples from Irbid (Jordan), where Yarmouk Water Company and World Waternet used camera inspections to assess sewer conditions and identify blockages, and Lusaka (Zambia), where Lusaka Water Supply & Sanitation Company is managing non-sewered sanitation through a 9-year World Bank-funded initiative. Project partners will share lessons learned and demonstrate how applying asset management principles can lead to more resilient and effective sanitation services.
Biogas production is becoming increasingly important in the context of the energy transition and circular economy – not only in agriculture, but also in municipal wastewater treatment and industry.The third part of the session focuses on an example of the use of biogas. The Mansa wastewater treatment plant, operated by the Luapula Water Supply and Sanitation Company (LpWSC), shows promising potential for biogas production from sewage sludge can be converted into renewable energy. An initial technical assessment indicates that, despite its modest size, the plant produces sufficient organic material for economically viable anaerobic digestion. Utilizing biogas can significantly improve energy self-sufficiency, reduce operational costs, and contribute to greenhouse gas emission reductions.
Objectives
Key objectives of this event are:
- To provide a brief overview of the methodology for monitoring SDG indicator 6.3.1 and an update of the latest results published in the 2024 indicator report.
- To emphasize the key role of water and wastewater operators to provide reliable quantitative and qualitative statistics.
- To introduce the methodology successfully used for the country-scale quantification of GHG emissions from domestic wastewater treatment plants in Thailand.
To demonstrate a road map of action-oriented steps to guide asset management principles in diverse urban settings to improve the reliability and sustainability of wastewater infrastructure.
To highlight field-level best practices from a WOP perspective (Nairobi, Irbid) and a World Bank funded perspective (Lusaka) that empower utilities to optimize workflows and resource allocation.
To facilitate knowledge exchange among practitioners through projects with similar challenges in different environments, emphasizing local challenges, adaptive strategies, and collaborative partnerships.
- To explain the feasibility of Biogas Production at Mansa WWTP, which depends of the 1) sludge quality (organic content and retention time support biogas generation), 2) infrastructure (tanks required for primary sludge removal are used for digestion), and 3) energy use (the biogas is intended to offset the electricity required for pumps).
- To assess the Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Zambian Utility Context, since biogas